# Text Generation WebUI vs transcriber

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Text Generation WebUI | transcriber |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 41/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 69 in AI Chat | #10 of 15 in Audio Processing |
| GitHub stars | 47 728 ✓ | 154 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +21 ✓ | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v4.9 · 20 May 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Text Generation WebUI scores 76/100 against 41/100 for transcriber, so it is the safer default.

Text Generation WebUI ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for transcriber.

If you want the quickest setup, Text Generation WebUI is easier to run; transcriber needs more configuration.

Text Generation WebUI is growing faster right now (+21 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Text Generation WebUI](https://selfhost.directory/project/text-generation-webui) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/text-generation-webui.md)
- [transcriber](https://selfhost.directory/project/transcriber) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/transcriber.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/text-generation-webui-vs-transcriber