Terraforming MarsvsUpptime
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Terraforming Mars | Upptime | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 14 in Gaming | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 961 | 17 185 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Markdown |
Which one should you pick?
Upptime scores 69/100 against 62/100 for Terraforming Mars, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; Terraforming Mars needs more configuration.
Terraforming Mars is growing faster right now (+9 stars in 30 days).
Terraforming Mars details →Upptime details →
Swap a project
Keep Terraforming Mars, compare it with
Keep Upptime, compare it with