# Termix vs Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Termix | Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 27 in Server Management | #4 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 15 705 ✓ | 1 725 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +469 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 44 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | sdk-v1.0.21 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ | 4.4.4 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Termix scores 76/100 against 64/100 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes, so it is the safer default.

Termix ships more often: 44 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes.

If you want the quickest setup, Termix is easier to run; Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes needs more configuration.

Termix is growing faster right now (+469 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Termix](https://selfhost.directory/project/termix) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/termix.md)
- [Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes](https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/termix-vs-zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s