# Termix vs Tube Archivist

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Termix | Tube Archivist |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 27 in Server Management | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 15 716 ✓ | 8 553 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +467 ✓ | +84 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 44 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | sdk-v1.0.21 · 24 Oct 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Termix scores 76/100 against 72/100 for Tube Archivist, so it is the safer default.

Termix ships more often: 44 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.

If you want the quickest setup, Termix is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.

Termix is growing faster right now (+467 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Termix](https://selfhost.directory/project/termix) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/termix.md)
- [Tube Archivist](https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/termix-vs-tube-archivist