# temporal vs Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | temporal | Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 ✓ | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in Workflow | #4 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 24 049 ✓ | 16 062 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +789 ✓ | +247 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 31 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 | w2026-10-23 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

temporal scores 83/100 against 80/100 for Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP), so it is the safer default.

Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) ships more often: 31 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for temporal.

If you want the quickest setup, Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.

temporal is growing faster right now (+789 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [temporal](https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal.md)
- [Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)](https://selfhost.directory/project/zed-attack-proxy-zap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zed-attack-proxy-zap.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/temporal-vs-zed-attack-proxy-zap