# temporal vs Workout.cool

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | temporal | Workout.cool |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 ✓ | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in Workflow | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 24 049 ✓ | 8 652 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +789 ✓ | +157 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

temporal scores 83/100 against 66/100 for Workout.cool, so it is the safer default.

temporal ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.

If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.

temporal is growing faster right now (+789 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [temporal](https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal.md)
- [Workout.cool](https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/temporal-vs-workout-cool