# temporal vs Windows ARM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | temporal | Windows ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in Workflow | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 24 039 ✓ | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +779 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 ✓ | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Batchfile |

## Which one should you pick?

temporal scores 83/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.

temporal ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Windows ARM.

temporal is growing faster right now (+779 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [temporal](https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal.md)
- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/temporal-vs-windows-arm