# temporal vs voice-chat-ai

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | temporal | voice-chat-ai |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in Workflow | #41 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 24 057 ✓ | 468 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +779 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.4.1 · 25 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

temporal scores 82/100 against 46/100 for voice-chat-ai, so it is the safer default.

temporal ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for voice-chat-ai.

If you want the quickest setup, voice-chat-ai is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.

temporal is growing faster right now (+779 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [temporal](https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal.md)
- [voice-chat-ai](https://selfhost.directory/project/voice-chat-ai) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/voice-chat-ai.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/temporal-vs-voice-chat-ai