# temporal vs Urocissa

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | temporal | Urocissa |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in Workflow | #11 of 19 in Photo Galleries |
| GitHub stars | 24 064 ✓ | 300 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +786 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 18 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 ✓ | 3.4.2 · 21 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

temporal scores 82/100 against 48/100 for Urocissa, so it is the safer default.

Urocissa ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for temporal.

If you want the quickest setup, Urocissa is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.

temporal is growing faster right now (+786 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [temporal](https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal.md)
- [Urocissa](https://selfhost.directory/project/urocissa) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/urocissa.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/temporal-vs-urocissa