# temporal vs uMap

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | temporal | uMap |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in Workflow | #3 of 9 in Mapping & GPS |
| GitHub stars | 24 049 ✓ | 1 628 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +771 ✓ | +25 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 12 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 ✓ | 3.8.1 · 19 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

temporal scores 82/100 against 65/100 for uMap, so it is the safer default.

uMap ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for temporal.

If you want the quickest setup, uMap is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.

temporal is growing faster right now (+771 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [temporal](https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal.md)
- [uMap](https://selfhost.directory/project/umap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/umap.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/temporal-vs-umap