# temporal vs TradingAgents

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | temporal | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in Workflow | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 24 052 | 117 967 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +774 | +5 608 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 11 |
| Latest release | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 82/100 for temporal, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, TradingAgents is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 608 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [temporal](https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal.md)
- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/temporal-vs-tradingagents