# Teleport vs WindowsinDocker

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Teleport | WindowsinDocker |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 83/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 40 in Authentication | #1 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 21 040 | 53 712 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +104 | +327 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | v18.10.0 · 8 Jul 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

WindowsinDocker scores 83/100 against 76/100 for Teleport, so it is the safer default.

WindowsinDocker ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Teleport.

If you want the quickest setup, WindowsinDocker is easier to run; Teleport needs more configuration.

WindowsinDocker is growing faster right now (+327 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Teleport](https://selfhost.directory/project/teleport) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/teleport.md)
- [WindowsinDocker](https://selfhost.directory/project/windowsindocker) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windowsindocker.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/teleport-vs-windowsindocker