# Technitium DNS Server vs woodpecker-ci

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Technitium DNS Server | woodpecker-ci |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 10 244 ✓ | 8 065 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +263 ✓ | +157 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 11 |
| Latest release | v15.6.2 · 17 Oct 2026 | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Technitium DNS Server scores 77/100 against 73/100 for woodpecker-ci, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Technitium DNS Server is easier to run; woodpecker-ci needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Technitium DNS Server](https://selfhost.directory/project/technitium-dns-server) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/technitium-dns-server.md)
- [woodpecker-ci](https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/technitium-dns-server-vs-woodpecker-ci