# Tdarr vs Urbit

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Tdarr | Urbit |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 ✓ | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 18 in Video Processing | #3 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 4 369 ✓ | 3 622 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +37 ✓ | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 6 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Makefile | hoon |

## Which one should you pick?

Tdarr scores 66/100 against 63/100 for Urbit, so it is the safer default.

Urbit ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Tdarr.

If you want the quickest setup, Tdarr is easier to run; Urbit needs more configuration.

Tdarr is growing faster right now (+37 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Tdarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/tdarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tdarr.md)
- [Urbit](https://selfhost.directory/project/urbit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/urbit.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/tdarr-vs-urbit