# Tdarr vs uptime-kuma

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Tdarr | uptime-kuma |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 | 88/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 18 in Video Processing | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 4 369 | 93 060 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +37 | +1 266 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Makefile | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 66/100 for Tdarr, so it is the safer default.

uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Tdarr.

uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 266 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Tdarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/tdarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tdarr.md)
- [uptime-kuma](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/tdarr-vs-uptime-kuma