# Tdarr vs Text Generation WebUI

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Tdarr | Text Generation WebUI |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 | 76/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 18 in Video Processing | #6 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 4 369 | 47 727 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +37 ✓ | +20 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v4.9 · 20 May 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Makefile | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Text Generation WebUI scores 76/100 against 66/100 for Tdarr, so it is the safer default.

Text Generation WebUI ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Tdarr.

## Details

- [Tdarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/tdarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tdarr.md)
- [Text Generation WebUI](https://selfhost.directory/project/text-generation-webui) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/text-generation-webui.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/tdarr-vs-text-generation-webui