# Tautulli vs Upptime

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Tautulli | Upptime |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 69/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #11 of 118 in Media Server | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 6 619 | 17 183 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +29 ✓ | +-1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.18.2 · 28 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Markdown |

## Which one should you pick?

Upptime scores 69/100 against 68/100 for Tautulli, so it is the safer default.

Tautulli ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.

If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; Tautulli needs more configuration.

Tautulli is growing faster right now (+29 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Tautulli](https://selfhost.directory/project/tautulli) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tautulli.md)
- [Upptime](https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/tautulli-vs-upptime