# Tasmota vs Tube Archivist

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Tasmota | Tube Archivist |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 104 in Home Automation | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 24 940 ✓ | 8 552 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +167 ✓ | +83 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 6 |
| Latest release | v16.0.0 · 16 Oct 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Tasmota scores 79/100 against 72/100 for Tube Archivist, so it is the safer default.

Tasmota is growing faster right now (+167 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Tasmota](https://selfhost.directory/project/tasmota) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tasmota.md)
- [Tube Archivist](https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/tasmota-vs-tube-archivist