taskchampion-sync-servervsTube Archivist
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| taskchampion-sync-server | Tube Archivist | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #18 of 38 in Personal Productivity | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 196 | 8 553 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +84 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 6 |
| Latest release | taskchampion-sync-server-0.2.1 · 10 Jun 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Tube Archivist scores 72/100 against 48/100 for taskchampion-sync-server, so it is the safer default.
Tube Archivist ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for taskchampion-sync-server.
If you want the quickest setup, taskchampion-sync-server is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.
Tube Archivist is growing faster right now (+84 stars in 30 days).
taskchampion-sync-server details →Tube Archivist details →
Swap a project
Keep taskchampion-sync-server, compare it with
Keep Tube Archivist, compare it with