tapflowvsZabbix
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| tapflow | Zabbix | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 55/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 10 in Testing | #13 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 1 364 | 6 519 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +108 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.30.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go Template |
Which one should you pick?
Zabbix scores 75/100 against 55/100 for tapflow, so it is the safer default.
tapflow ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zabbix.
If you want the quickest setup, tapflow is easier to run; Zabbix needs more configuration.
Zabbix is growing faster right now (+108 stars in 30 days).
tapflow details →Zabbix details →
Swap a project
Keep tapflow, compare it with
Keep Zabbix, compare it with