# tapflow vs Workout.cool

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | tapflow | Workout.cool |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 55/100 | 66/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 10 in Testing | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 1 364 | 8 652 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +157 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v0.30.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Workout.cool scores 66/100 against 55/100 for tapflow, so it is the safer default.

tapflow ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.

If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; tapflow needs more configuration.

Workout.cool is growing faster right now (+157 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [tapflow](https://selfhost.directory/project/tapflow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tapflow.md)
- [Workout.cool](https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/tapflow-vs-workout-cool