# tapflow vs WBO

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | tapflow | WBO |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 55/100 | 61/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 10 in Testing | #2 of 9 in Whiteboarding |
| GitHub stars | 1 377 | 2 675 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +7 | +18 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 4 |
| Latest release | v0.30.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | v2.18.26 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

WBO scores 61/100 against 55/100 for tapflow, so it is the safer default.

tapflow ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for WBO.

If you want the quickest setup, WBO is easier to run; tapflow needs more configuration.

WBO is growing faster right now (+18 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [tapflow](https://selfhost.directory/project/tapflow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tapflow.md)
- [WBO](https://selfhost.directory/project/wbo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wbo.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/tapflow-vs-wbo