# tapflow vs Vert

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | tapflow | Vert |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 55/100 | 71/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 10 in Testing | #2 of 10 in File Conversion |
| GitHub stars | 1 375 | 16 173 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 | +540 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.30.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Vert scores 71/100 against 55/100 for tapflow, so it is the safer default.

tapflow ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Vert.

If you want the quickest setup, Vert is easier to run; tapflow needs more configuration.

Vert is growing faster right now (+540 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [tapflow](https://selfhost.directory/project/tapflow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tapflow.md)
- [Vert](https://selfhost.directory/project/vert) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/vert.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/tapflow-vs-vert