tapflowvsUrbit
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| tapflow | Urbit | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 55/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 10 in Testing | #3 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 1 376 | 3 622 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +6 | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 6 |
| Latest release | v0.30.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | hoon |
Which one should you pick?
Urbit scores 63/100 against 55/100 for tapflow, so it is the safer default.
tapflow ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Urbit.
If you want the quickest setup, tapflow is easier to run; Urbit needs more configuration.
tapflow details →Urbit details →
Swap a project
Keep tapflow, compare it with
Keep Urbit, compare it with