# tapflow vs Upptime

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | tapflow | Upptime |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 55/100 | 69/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 10 in Testing | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 1 377 | 17 184 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +7 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.30.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Markdown |

## Which one should you pick?

Upptime scores 69/100 against 55/100 for tapflow, so it is the safer default.

tapflow ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.

If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; tapflow needs more configuration.

tapflow is growing faster right now (+7 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [tapflow](https://selfhost.directory/project/tapflow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tapflow.md)
- [Upptime](https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/tapflow-vs-upptime