tapflowvsUpptime
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| tapflow | Upptime | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 55/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 10 in Testing | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 1 375 | 17 184 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.30.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Markdown |
Which one should you pick?
Upptime scores 69/100 against 55/100 for tapflow, so it is the safer default.
tapflow ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.
If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; tapflow needs more configuration.
tapflow is growing faster right now (+5 stars in 30 days).
tapflow details →Upptime details →
Swap a project
Keep tapflow, compare it with
Keep Upptime, compare it with