# tapflow vs trigger

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | tapflow | trigger |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 55/100 | 76/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 10 in Testing | #7 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 1 376 | 16 650 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +6 | +251 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 49 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.30.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v4.8.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

trigger scores 76/100 against 55/100 for tapflow, so it is the safer default.

trigger ships more often: 49 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for tapflow.

If you want the quickest setup, tapflow is easier to run; trigger needs more configuration.

trigger is growing faster right now (+251 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [tapflow](https://selfhost.directory/project/tapflow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tapflow.md)
- [trigger](https://selfhost.directory/project/trigger) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/trigger.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/tapflow-vs-trigger