# tapflow vs TradingAgents

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | tapflow | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 55/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 10 in Testing | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 1 358 | 117 848 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +5 489 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.30.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 55/100 for tapflow, so it is the safer default.

TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for tapflow.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 489 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [tapflow](https://selfhost.directory/project/tapflow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tapflow.md)
- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/tapflow-vs-tradingagents