# tapflow vs Text Generation WebUI

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | tapflow | Text Generation WebUI |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 55/100 | 76/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 10 in Testing | #6 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 1 376 | 47 726 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +6 | +19 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 10 |
| Latest release | v0.30.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v4.9 · 20 May 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Text Generation WebUI scores 76/100 against 55/100 for tapflow, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Text Generation WebUI is easier to run; tapflow needs more configuration.

Text Generation WebUI is growing faster right now (+19 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [tapflow](https://selfhost.directory/project/tapflow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tapflow.md)
- [Text Generation WebUI](https://selfhost.directory/project/text-generation-webui) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/text-generation-webui.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/tapflow-vs-text-generation-webui