# Tailscale vs Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Tailscale | Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 56 in VPN | #4 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 38 241 ✓ | 1 725 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 436 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v1.104.4 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | 4.4.4 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Other |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Tailscale scores 84/100 against 64/100 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes, so it is the safer default.

Tailscale ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes.

If you want the quickest setup, Tailscale is easier to run; Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes needs more configuration.

Tailscale is growing faster right now (+1 436 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Tailscale](https://selfhost.directory/project/tailscale) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tailscale.md)
- [Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes](https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/tailscale-vs-zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s