# Tailscale vs UUSEC WAF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Tailscale | UUSEC WAF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 56 in VPN | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 38 231 ✓ | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 426 ✓ | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v1.104.4 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Go | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

Tailscale scores 84/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.

Tailscale ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.

Tailscale is growing faster right now (+1 426 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Tailscale](https://selfhost.directory/project/tailscale) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tailscale.md)
- [UUSEC WAF](https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/tailscale-vs-uusec-waf