# Syslog-ng vs wraft

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Syslog-ng | wraft |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 ✓ | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 8 in Logging | #35 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 2 386 ✓ | 167 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +10 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 3 ✓ |
| Latest release | syslog-ng-4.12.0 · 16 Jun 2026 | v0.6.7 · 25 Sept 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | Elixir |

## Which one should you pick?

Syslog-ng scores 66/100 against 44/100 for wraft, so it is the safer default.

wraft ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Syslog-ng.

If you want the quickest setup, Syslog-ng is easier to run; wraft needs more configuration.

Syslog-ng is growing faster right now (+10 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Syslog-ng](https://selfhost.directory/project/syslog-ng) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/syslog-ng.md)
- [wraft](https://selfhost.directory/project/wraft) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wraft.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/syslog-ng-vs-wraft