# Syslog-ng vs transcriber

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Syslog-ng | transcriber |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 ✓ | 41/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 8 in Logging | #10 of 15 in Audio Processing |
| GitHub stars | 2 386 ✓ | 154 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +10 ✓ | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | syslog-ng-4.12.0 · 16 Jun 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | C | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Syslog-ng scores 66/100 against 41/100 for transcriber, so it is the safer default.

Syslog-ng ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for transcriber.

Syslog-ng is growing faster right now (+10 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Syslog-ng](https://selfhost.directory/project/syslog-ng) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/syslog-ng.md)
- [transcriber](https://selfhost.directory/project/transcriber) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/transcriber.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/syslog-ng-vs-transcriber