# SyncWatch同步观影 vs Workout.cool

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | SyncWatch同步观影 | Workout.cool |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 46/100 | 66/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #24 of 36 in Video Streaming | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 140 | 8 654 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +155 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v2.4.4 · 6 Sept 2026 ✓ | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Workout.cool scores 66/100 against 46/100 for SyncWatch同步观影, so it is the safer default.

SyncWatch同步观影 ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.

If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; SyncWatch同步观影 needs more configuration.

Workout.cool is growing faster right now (+155 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [SyncWatch同步观影](https://selfhost.directory/project/syncwatch) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/syncwatch.md)
- [Workout.cool](https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/syncwatch-vs-workout-cool