# SyncWatch同步观影 vs uptime-kuma

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | SyncWatch同步观影 | uptime-kuma |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 46/100 | 88/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #24 of 36 in Video Streaming | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 140 | 93 060 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +1 266 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.4.4 · 6 Sept 2026 | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 46/100 for SyncWatch同步观影, so it is the safer default.

uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for SyncWatch同步观影.

If you want the quickest setup, uptime-kuma is easier to run; SyncWatch同步观影 needs more configuration.

uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 266 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [SyncWatch同步观影](https://selfhost.directory/project/syncwatch) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/syncwatch.md)
- [uptime-kuma](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/syncwatch-vs-uptime-kuma