# SyncWatch同步观影 vs trigger

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | SyncWatch同步观影 | trigger |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 46/100 | 76/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #24 of 36 in Video Streaming | #7 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 140 | 16 650 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +251 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 49 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.4.4 · 6 Sept 2026 | v4.8.1 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

trigger scores 76/100 against 46/100 for SyncWatch同步观影, so it is the safer default.

trigger ships more often: 49 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for SyncWatch同步观影.

If you want the quickest setup, SyncWatch同步观影 is easier to run; trigger needs more configuration.

trigger is growing faster right now (+251 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [SyncWatch同步观影](https://selfhost.directory/project/syncwatch) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/syncwatch.md)
- [trigger](https://selfhost.directory/project/trigger) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/trigger.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/syncwatch-vs-trigger