# SyncWatch同步观影 vs temporal

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | SyncWatch同步观影 | temporal |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 46/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #24 of 36 in Video Streaming | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 140 | 24 053 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +775 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.4.4 · 6 Sept 2026 | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

temporal scores 82/100 against 46/100 for SyncWatch同步观影, so it is the safer default.

temporal ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for SyncWatch同步观影.

If you want the quickest setup, SyncWatch同步观影 is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.

temporal is growing faster right now (+775 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [SyncWatch同步观影](https://selfhost.directory/project/syncwatch) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/syncwatch.md)
- [temporal](https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/syncwatch-vs-temporal