# Syncthing vs tapflow

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Syncthing | tapflow |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 ✓ | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 15 in File Sync | #4 of 10 in Testing |
| GitHub stars | 89 849 ✓ | 1 377 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +939 ✓ | +7 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.1.7 · 21 Oct 2026 | v0.30.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Syncthing scores 90/100 against 55/100 for tapflow, so it is the safer default.

tapflow ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for Syncthing.

If you want the quickest setup, Syncthing is easier to run; tapflow needs more configuration.

Syncthing is growing faster right now (+939 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Syncthing](https://selfhost.directory/project/syncthing) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/syncthing.md)
- [tapflow](https://selfhost.directory/project/tapflow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tapflow.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/syncthing-vs-tapflow