# Sync-in vs Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Sync-in | Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 64/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #18 of 86 in File Sharing | #4 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 1 944 ✓ | 1 725 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +172 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v2.6.1 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | 4.4.4 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes scores 64/100 against 63/100 for Sync-in, so it is the safer default.

Sync-in ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes.

If you want the quickest setup, Sync-in is easier to run; Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes needs more configuration.

Sync-in is growing faster right now (+172 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Sync-in](https://selfhost.directory/project/sync-in) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sync-in.md)
- [Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes](https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/sync-in-vs-zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s