Sync-invsZero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Sync-in | Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #18 of 86 in File Sharing | #4 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 1 944 | 1 725 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +172 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 9 |
| Latest release | v2.6.1 · 25 Oct 2026 | 4.4.4 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes scores 64/100 against 63/100 for Sync-in, so it is the safer default.
Sync-in ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes.
If you want the quickest setup, Sync-in is easier to run; Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes needs more configuration.
Sync-in is growing faster right now (+172 stars in 30 days).
Sync-in details →Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes details →
Swap a project
Keep Sync-in, compare it with
Keep Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes, compare it with