Sync-invsZammad
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Sync-in | Zammad | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #21 of 86 in File Sharing | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 1 944 | 6 050 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +165 | +98 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.6.1 · 25 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
Zammad scores 70/100 against 62/100 for Sync-in, so it is the safer default.
Sync-in ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.
If you want the quickest setup, Sync-in is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.
Sync-in details →Zammad details →
Swap a project
Keep Sync-in, compare it with
Keep Zammad, compare it with