# Sync-in vs Tube Archivist

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Sync-in | Tube Archivist |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 | 72/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #21 of 86 in File Sharing | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 1 945 | 8 552 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +166 ✓ | +83 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | v2.6.1 · 25 Oct 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Tube Archivist scores 72/100 against 62/100 for Sync-in, so it is the safer default.

Sync-in ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.

If you want the quickest setup, Sync-in is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Sync-in](https://selfhost.directory/project/sync-in) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sync-in.md)
- [Tube Archivist](https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/sync-in-vs-tube-archivist