# Sync-in vs trip2g

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Sync-in | trip2g |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 ✓ | 40/100 |
| Rank in category | #21 of 86 in File Sharing | #30 of 42 in Knowledge Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 945 ✓ | 40 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +166 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | v2.6.1 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.12.0 · 19 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Sync-in scores 62/100 against 40/100 for trip2g, so it is the safer default.

Sync-in ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for trip2g.

If you want the quickest setup, Sync-in is easier to run; trip2g needs more configuration.

Sync-in is growing faster right now (+166 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Sync-in](https://selfhost.directory/project/sync-in) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sync-in.md)
- [trip2g](https://selfhost.directory/project/trip2g) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/trip2g.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/sync-in-vs-trip2g