Sync-invsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Sync-in | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #18 of 86 in File Sharing | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 1 944 | 117 848 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +172 | +5 489 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 11 |
| Latest release | v2.6.1 · 25 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 63/100 for Sync-in, so it is the safer default.
Sync-in ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.
If you want the quickest setup, Sync-in is easier to run; TradingAgents needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 489 stars in 30 days).
Sync-in details →TradingAgents details →
Swap a project
Keep Sync-in, compare it with
Keep TradingAgents, compare it with