# swiftwave vs turbocloud-agent

> Two self-hosted [Heroku alternatives](https://selfhost.directory/alternative-to/heroku), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | swiftwave | turbocloud-agent |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 ✓ | 35/100 |
| Rank in category | #23 of 44 in Container Management | #14 of 14 in Platform as a Service |
| GitHub stars | 908 ✓ | 21 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | 2.23.1-1 · 2 Aug 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

swiftwave scores 49/100 against 35/100 for turbocloud-agent, so it is the safer default.

swiftwave ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for turbocloud-agent.

## Details

- [swiftwave](https://selfhost.directory/project/swiftwave) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/swiftwave.md)
- [turbocloud-agent](https://selfhost.directory/project/turbocloud-agent) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/turbocloud-agent.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/swiftwave-vs-turbocloud-agent