supervsUrbit
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| super | Urbit | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 53/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #15 of 34 in Network Management | #3 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 875 | 3 622 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 26 | 6 |
| Latest release | rpios-v1.2.18 · 26 Oct 2026 | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | hoon |
Which one should you pick?
Urbit scores 63/100 against 53/100 for super, so it is the safer default.
super ships more often: 26 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Urbit.
If you want the quickest setup, super is easier to run; Urbit needs more configuration.
Urbit is growing faster right now (+5 stars in 30 days).
super details →Urbit details →
Swap a project
Keep super, compare it with
Keep Urbit, compare it with