# super vs temporal

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | super | temporal |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 53/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #15 of 34 in Network Management | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 875 | 24 057 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +779 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 26 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | rpios-v1.2.18 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

temporal scores 82/100 against 53/100 for super, so it is the safer default.

super ships more often: 26 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for temporal.

If you want the quickest setup, super is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.

temporal is growing faster right now (+779 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [super](https://selfhost.directory/project/super) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/super.md)
- [temporal](https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/super-vs-temporal