# Super Productivity vs zookeeper

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Super Productivity | zookeeper |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 ✓ | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 34 in Task Management | #1 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 23 246 ✓ | 12 825 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 006 ✓ | +14 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 22 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v19.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

Super Productivity scores 83/100 against 73/100 for zookeeper, so it is the safer default.

Super Productivity ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for zookeeper.

If you want the quickest setup, Super Productivity is easier to run; zookeeper needs more configuration.

Super Productivity is growing faster right now (+1 006 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Super Productivity](https://selfhost.directory/project/super-productivity) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/super-productivity.md)
- [zookeeper](https://selfhost.directory/project/zookeeper) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zookeeper.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/super-productivity-vs-zookeeper