# supabase vs Zigbee2MQTT

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | supabase | Zigbee2MQTT |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 92/100 ✓ | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 40 in Database Management | #5 of 104 in Home Automation |
| GitHub stars | 114 278 ✓ | 15 762 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 530 ✓ | +98 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 15 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 | 2.14.2 · 1 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

supabase scores 92/100 against 76/100 for Zigbee2MQTT, so it is the safer default.

Zigbee2MQTT ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for supabase.

If you want the quickest setup, Zigbee2MQTT is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.

supabase is growing faster right now (+3 530 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [supabase](https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase.md)
- [Zigbee2MQTT](https://selfhost.directory/project/zigbee2mqtt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zigbee2mqtt.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs supabase](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-supabase)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/supabase-vs-zigbee2mqtt