# supabase vs Yolks

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | supabase | Yolks |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 92/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 40 in Database Management | #25 of 44 in Container Management |
| GitHub stars | 114 285 ✓ | 195 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 537 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Dockerfile |

## Which one should you pick?

supabase scores 92/100 against 48/100 for Yolks, so it is the safer default.

supabase ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Yolks.

If you want the quickest setup, Yolks is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.

supabase is growing faster right now (+3 537 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [supabase](https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase.md)
- [Yolks](https://selfhost.directory/project/yolks) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/yolks.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs supabase](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-supabase)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/supabase-vs-yolks